Monday, January 1, 2018

The best local news anchor in America is retiring

Published Jan. 17, 2008 at A Capitol Idea (or Two):

Outside of the San Francisco Bay Area, we doubt many people have heard of Dennis Richmond. But he's a Bay Area legend, and as the headline says, in our opinion, anyway, the best local news anchor in the country.
Richmond announced Wednesday he will retire in May. The Bay Area is losing a magnificent journalist who was, we repeat, the best local news anchor in the country.
Why am we trumpeting so much over a local news anchor?
It's simple. In an age where news shows are dominated by shallow personalities engaged in happy talk and cute comments, Richmond, in his 30 years as news anchor of KTVU's "The 10 O'Clock News," has delivered the who, what, when, where and why without hoopla or gimmicks. His straightforward, unbiased manner is the news the way it should be, but isn't.
In a story on KTVU's website, the station's Vice President and General Manager Tom McVay said, "As a working journalist, Dennis is the pinnacle of objectivity and fairness. When you watch him anchor, you know you're getting the real news. He has never let his feelings or opinions drift into the stories he delivers. Dennis and his style of delivery has defined KTVU for decades."
Exactly. In an age defined by news anchors who claim to be unbiased but aren't, Richmond was the real deal. Richmond delivered the news without embellishments and gave viewers the facts. Just the facts and nothing more.
It's unbelievable that there aren't more like him. Actually, it's kind of sad. There is an undercurrent of distrust of the media today, but there was nothing like that with Richmond. Delivering the news to him means telling it like it is. Period.
Those of us in the journalism profession looked up to Richmond. As a longtime viewer of Bay Area TV news, we've seen it all. The personable types, the down-to-earth anchors and the crusaders. Richmond is better than all of them.
Thanks, Dennis. We'll sadly countdown the days until your final broadcast May 21.
We feel sorry for whoever at KTVU has to pick your successor. That'll be one hell of a tough job.





Disneyland experts, test your knowledge

By Steve Marinucci and Rebecca Hall
Mercury News
Published April 17, 2005 in the San Jose Mercury News

DISNEYLAND EXPERTS, TEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE

Think you know the history of the Happiest Place on Earth pretty well? Take our quiz and see how you match up against some real Disneyphiles.

1) Back when Disney sold individual tickets to rides rather than charge one general-admission price, an ''E'' ticket got you onto the top-tier attractions. Which one of the following was NOT an E ticket ride?
a) Matterhorn
b) Pirates of the
Caribbean
c) Mr. Toad's Wild Ride
d) Monorail

2) Adventureland had only one working ride the day the park opened. What was it?

3) Name four of the eight submarines in the original Submarine Voyage.

4) The current Winnie the Pooh attraction in Frontierland replaced another group of bears. What was the name of that attraction?

5) Which attraction was originally created for the 1964 World's Fair?
a) Mission to Mars
b) America Sings
c) It's a Small World
d) The Peoplemover

6) How many spooks live in the Haunted Mansion (according to the narrator)?

7) What actor served as singer and narrator of America Sings?

8) How many spinning cups are on the Mad Tea Party?
a) 15
b) 16
c) 17
d) 18

9) At Mickey's Toontown, what's in the refrigerator in Minnie's House?

10) Name the singing group that first performed on Disneyland's Main Street in 1957 and, in its current form, still performs there today.

11) Which of these attractions has been at the park the longest?
a) Mark Twain's
Riverboat
b) Great Moments
with Mr. Lincoln
c) Matterhorn

12) What's inside the tip of the Matterhorn?

13) The Swiss Family Treehouse was evicted to make room for which tree-dweller?

14) Which of the following has not been sold at the concession stands?
a) Pretzels
b) Turkey drumsticks
c) Carl's Jr. hamburgers
d) McDonald's fries

15) When was Disneyland finished?


THE ANSWERS

1) Mr. Toad's Wild Ride.

2) Jungle Cruise.

3) Nautilus, Triton, Sea Wolf, Skate, Skipjack, George Washington, Patrick Henry and Ethan Allen.

4) Country Bear Jamboree.

5) It's a Small World.

6) There are 999. But there's always room for 1,000.

7) Burl Ives.

8) 18 teacups.

9) Cheese, of course.

10) The Dapper Dans.

11) Mark Twain's Riverboat.

12) A basketball court. A very small one.

13) Tarzan.

14) Carl's Jr. hamburgers.

15) Never. Walt Disney said it would always be changing.

-- Mercury News


CAPTION: PHOTO: DISNEY CO.
The original Submarine Voyage had eight submarines; can you name four of them?
PHOTO: DISNEY CO.
The Monorail and the Matterhorn have always been wildly popular, but were they both ''E'' ticket rides?

The Beatles put the music out once. Why can't they put it out again?

(Originally published Dec. 27 on Examiner.com.)

By Steve Marinucci
Beatles Examiner

Nothing gets Beatles fans worked up than talking about releases of Beatle music. Especially releases of Beatle music they don't have.

The New York Times started all the commotion again with an article today by Allan Kozinn with the headline "Hard Day's Night for Beatle Reissues." As we mentioned in our Beatle news roundup this morning, for anyone looking for good news, there is very little to speak of. Getting the Beatles tunes on iTunes won't be coming soon. Paul McCartney said that at the end of November.

"Let It Be" on DVD? At one time, it was 2005, then supposedly 2007. In late July, after rumors circulated that Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr were blocking its release on DVD, an Apple spokesman told me exclusively, "We do have plans to release it sometime in the future" Not really much to go on, but at least it's still on someone's agenda.

What about the much rumored highly anticipated reissues? Nothing. In fact, it's so quiet on that score you could hear a needle drop. The best Apple could do for Christmas was the Beatles iPod (originally $899, though the price dropped to almost half of that just before Christmas) and assorted designer (read expensive) clothing at Bloomingdale's, "All Together Now," a backstage DVD of the Vegas "Love" show (what happened in Vegas didn't stay there this time) and a White Album rollerball pen for $295 through their website. And then there was the deal for a Beatles video game next year.

Whatever happened to the music?

As viewers of the "All Together Now" DVD saw and heard for themselves, nothing gets done by the Beatles' brain trust without a unanimous vote. This is something I was told years ago by a trusted source and the ATN DVD confirmed it for all to see. There are no three strikes here. One strike and you're out in the Beatles ball game.

Who's holding up the show isn't the question. The fact it's being held up and will apparently continue to do so is the problem.

The Beatles' arrival on iTunes is way overdue. So far overdue, in fact, that they've almost worn out their financial welcome, though certainly the public will respond when it finally does take place.

And almost everyone except the Beatles has issued updated CDs, some more than once. Meanwhile, Beatle fans are still stuck with the same original CDs released in 1987. That was over two decades ago. Those statistics only make a bad song even worse.

The Beatles certainly know what they need to do. For one, get the music on an online service ASAP. Every day it isn't there means big bucks that aren't in their pocket and that of the sagging industry, which would certainly reap benefits from it.

Release "Let It Be" on DVD. NOW. Forget the issues. It was out once on video. It needs to be out again. Put a stop to all those non-remastered "remastered" copies for sale all over.

Then, put a firm target date on the first remastered CDs and let the public know about it. They'll be excited and Apple will have a deadline to work to. And DON'T CHANGE IT.

The situation is not beyond repair. It can be fixed. All the Beatles need is to do is just do it.

Happy New Year? 1962 wasn't one for the Beatles

(Published on Examiner.com Jan. 1, 2009.)
By Steve Marinucci
Beatles Examiner

If you're an up-and-coming band trying to work your way up to the "toppermost of the poppermost," as John Lennon liked to call it, an audition with a major record company is a huge step.

That was the case on Jan. 1, 1962, as the Beatles -- John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison and then drummer Pete Best -- prepared to audition for Decca Records, one of the most well-known record companies in the business at the time.

Decca, along with EMI, was one of the two biggest labels in Britain, and the first major to grant the Beatles an audition.

The group was driven to the session by roadie Neil Aspinall. At the audition, John Lennon originally wanted the group to do a rock 'n' roll set as at the Cavern, but Brian Epstein overruled that, persuading them to play standards and a few originals.

The Beatles recorded 15 songs that day, including several they would never record for EMI. Twelve were covers of songs written by others -- "Searchin'," "'Till There Was You," "Three Cool Cats," "Besame Mucho," "To Know Him Is To Love Her," "September in the Rain," "Three Cool Cats," "Money (That's What I Want)", "Sure To Fall," "Memphis, Tennessee," "Crying, Waiting, Hoping" and "Take Good Care of My Baby" -- while three -- "Hello, Little Girl," "Love of the Loved" and "Like Dreamers Do" -- were Lennon-McCartney originals.

It was not one of the group's finest hours. The songs they chose to record, including the three Lennon-McCartney songs, weren't the best choices for an occasion like this. The Beatles were also very nervous. At one point on "'Till There Was You," you can hear Paul's voice crack.

“I'd like to say thank you on behalf of the group and ourselves, and I hope we pass the audition," John Lennon would joke later in the movie "Let It Be." But they were rejected. Recording manager Dick Rowe, who, in his career, signed some huge names to Decca, including Tommy Steele after he was turned down by George Martin, has received the blame in Beatle history for turning down the Beatles, but Bill Harry notes in "The Beatles Encyclopedia" it was actually Mike Smith (not the Dave Clark 5 singer), the man who did the recording that day, who said thanks but no thanks to the Fabs.

So why were they turned down? The reason cited most often is that the label chose to sign Brian Poole and the Tremeloes instead of the Beatles.

But this statement that Brian Epstein is said to have attributed to Rowe will probably be forever linked to him: "Not to mince words, Mr. Epstein, we don't like your boys' sound. Groups are out. Four-piece groups with guitars are particularly finished." Bill Harry says Rowe later denied making the statement. Harry also notes that EMI actually turned the Beatles down before Sir George Martin agreed to record them for its Parlophone label.

That "groups are out" philosophy, if it was indeed true, didn't stay in place at Decca very long, by the way. They signed the Rolling Stones in early 1963.

The Decca sessions remained an unheard mystery for most Beatle collectors until the 1970s. A Beatle fan magazine first brought them to light, then 14 of the 15 tracks appeared on a series of seven bootleg vinyl 45 RPM singles on the Deccagone label. After the last of the singles appeared, an album with all 15 cuts, including "Take Good Care of My Baby," omitted on the singles, became available. The songs also became available on several bootlegged CDs.

For a while, the songs could be found on various above-ground releases, though generally without the Lennon-McCartney originals. The Beatles themselves finally issued five of the tracks -- "Searchin'," "The Sheik of Araby," "Three Cool Cats," "Like Dreamers Do" and "Hello, Little Girl" -- to the public on the two-CD set "The Beatles Anthology 1."

The Decca sessions aren't the Beatles' greatest moments. Along with the Tony Sheridan tracks ("My Bonnie," "Ain't She Sweet"), they are probably the best-sounding example of the Beatles before Beatlemania.

And while the Decca rejection was certainly a low point and probably didn't do a whole lot for their morale at the time, the group at least could pin their hopes on the thought that things could only get better.

They certainly did. In just over a year, the "Please Please Me" album hit the top spot in the Melody Maker UK album chart the first week of March in 1963, seven weeks after making its debut. The "toppermost of the poppermost" phrase that John Lennon had used so often had become reality.

Bill King talks about 30 years of being a Beatlefan (editor)

(Published 12/30/08 on Examiner.com)

By Steve Marinucci
Beatles Examiner

Let's travel back in time to 1978.

It was the year "Mull of Kintyre" became a huge hit for Paul McCartney almost everywhere -- except the United States. It was the year Ringo Starr appeared in his own TV special and had a role in the movie "Sextette" with Mae West. The year George and Olivia Harrison's son, Dhani, was born, when John adlibbed a parody of Bob Dylan inspired by a newscast and when the Rutles' film "All You Need Is Cash" debuted.

It was also the year Beatlefan magazine made its debut. Its most recent issue marks its 30th anniversary. We sent editor Bill King some questions by email and got his responses.

Q: What motivated you to start Beatlefan?

Bill King: It was really a case of starting a magazine that I'd always wanted to read. I wanted a magazine about The Beatles that was more than just a fan club newsletter and that was published on a regular basis. I also wanted a publication that was professionally put together. That desire dovetailed with my wife, Leslie, and I wanting to start a publication of our own on the side. We were both journalists. I was the rock critic of The Atlanta Constitution at the time and so had access to a lot of sources of news about The Beatles. After having dinner with Mark and Carol Lapidos, who were in Atlanta to stage a Beatlefest, Leslie and I decided to launch our Beatles magazine. Mark kindly offered to let us put flyers for it on the main table at the Beatlefest. And right before Christmas 1978, our first issue came out, which included my interview with Joe English (who was back living in Georgia at the time after having left Wings) and our first "scoop," that McCartney was leaving Capitol for Columbia in the U.S.

Q: What changes in your immediate family have happened since you started publishing (kids, how they've grown up).

Bill King: Well, our son, Bill, came along in 1985. His first real concert ever was McCartney at the Georgia Dome, and he's been to numerous Paul and Ringo shows since. He grew up with Beatles music around him, but I never forced it on him. He became a fan on his own. He's written some pieces for Beatlefan and handles our web site. Our daughter, Olivia, was born in 1984, a day after we had sent an issue off to the printer and a few hours after we put a special Beatlefan/EXTRA! in the mail with our exclusive report that the Threetles were together recording "Free As a Bird." That report got cited by newspapers and wire services around the world. Olivia also has become a fan of Beatles music on her own. Interestingly, she really got into it through a CD of cover versions of Beatles songs designed for kids.

Q: How has producing the magazine changed since you started?

Bill King: When we began, there was no such thing as desktop publishing. The fanzines that were around were generally done on typewriters. We decided we wanted ours to be professionally typeset, and fortunately a college pal of ours had some Compugraphic phototypesetting equipment left over from a failed weekly newspaper venture. Leslie had some experience typesetting from time working at her hometown weekly paper, so our friend agreed to rent us time on his typesetter. Leslie set the stories, which came out of the machine on long strips of photopaper, which I then pasted up on a page form that was then sent to the printer. We initially used a local Kwik Kopy as our printer before graduating to the newsprint format with slick covers we still use today. Eventually, of course, we quit using a typesetter and started producing the magazine on a Mac. The format of Beatlefan evolved, too. The first couple of years we began the articles on the front cover like a newsletter. The first issue where we went to a magazine-style cover was our John Lennon memorial issue, which was put together in the two weeks after Lennon died and was the first memorial to come out aside from the weekly newsmagazines like Time and Newsweek.
Bill King and Rick Glover
Bill King, right, with "Fan on the Run" Rick Glover

Q: As a professional journalist (at The Atlanta Journal-Constitution), what changes have you noticed in how the Beatles relate to the press and the press relate to the Beatles in 30 years?

Bill King: When I started in newspapers, four years before Beatlefan was born and just after I graduated from college, the World War II generation was still running things and they tended to still view The Beatles as kid stuff. But as my generation, the Beatles generation, came into positions of authority in the media, that changed. Any news to do with The Beatles generally got pretty big play in the 1980s and ’90s because their fans were making the decisions on what was covered. Now that a younger generation of editors has joined the mix, there's a bit less interest in the solo Beatles individually, but anything to do with them as a group still gets pretty big play. The Beatles are still cool even with college kids. You notice the continuing influence of the Beatles generation of journalists on coverage when something happens like Ringo announcing he's not going to sign autographs by mail any more or the Vatican "forgiving" Lennon. Big, prestigious newspapers will even comment on these events on their editorial pages. So The Beatles are still big news. As for how they relate to the press, I'd say that hasn't changed much over the years. George never was that comfortable with the press in general, though he was a good sport about it when it became necessary. McCartney still knows how to charm reporters and Ringo has proved to be pretty quick-witted, though at times he has a bit of a temper and is much pricklier. They both have become increasingly available for press interviews over the years, but not substantial ones. There's not much of interest that can be discussed in a five-minute phoner where they just want to plug the latest release.

Q: The story you're proudest of?

Bill King: Hard to narrow it to one single story. I'm very proud of that Lennon memorial issue. I'm proud of the "Free As a Bird" scoop. I'm proud of our city-by-city tour coverage over the years, our "Anthology" coverage (one person involved in that project commented in amazement at our sources for breaking fresh information during that time), and I'm proud of many of the interviews we've run. Perhaps my two favorite stories that I did myself, besides my "A Fan's Notes" series about what it was like to grow up as a fan of The Beatles, were the "Unity Through Diversity" piece in which I used contemporary quotes from the Fabs from 1969-70 to show that the breakup was not a foregone conclusion, and my interview with Phil Ramone in which we went track by track through the "lost" McCartney album he produced.

Q: Meeting the Beatles -- any stories?

Bill King: I met and briefly interviewed George at a press function in Washington, D.C., when the "33 1/3" album was about to come out. He was very gracious and kind, but I also noted how incredibly weak his handshake was. I never got to meet John, unfortunately. I sat next to Paul for an hour as I participated with about five other journalists in a group interview at the time of the "Give My Regards to Broad Street" release. I had gotten to the interview room long before anyone else and guessed right about where he would sit and situated myself to his immediate left. That was a thrill. I've questioned him at several tour press conferences since then. My brother and I and a friend once ended up backstage at a McCartney concert when a hotel clerk mistakenly directed us to an MPL staff shuttle bus, but we didn't run into Paul. The looks on our other friends' faces as we waved from the bus as it entered the gate was priceless, though! I first met Ringo when he came to Atlanta for a press conference announcing his involvement in a restaurant there. I've done a couple of press conferences with him since.

Q: Have the Beatles ever commented on the magazine?

Bill King: Not directly. We've never really sought direct involvement with them because we like the editorial freedom of being independent. But a friend who's visited Paul's home said that he found a copy of Beatlefan on the bookshelf there, and Paul has indicated to our chief Fan on the Run, Rick Glover, that he's seen some of our tour coverage and thought it was great. Yoko Ono has indicated she's aware of us. I've had indications Ringo has seen some of our coverage of his All Starr Band tours, too. I don't know whether George knew of us or not, but I suspect he did since Brian Roylance of Genesis Publications, one of his closest friends, knew all about us. As far as the inner circle goes, the late Derek Taylor was well acquainted with us. I first interviewed him in Liverpool and then did a lengthy phone interview with him a few years later and he remembered what I looked like and what I'd written about him previously. And when ABC set me up to talk with him about the "Anthology," he came on the line and said there was nothing he could tell me that I didn't already know! A thoroughly charming man and much missed.

New movie about the Beatles being crowdfunded on Kickstarter - 12/28/11 Examiner.com

Published 12/28/11 on Examiner.com. 

In the wake of the success of the funding of "Good Ol' Freda"  through Kickstarter.com, there's a second movie about the Beatles
 now in the middle of a campaign on the website to raise money. 
The movie, called "The Beatles at Their Best," is a documentary about Pete Best's stint with the Beatles. The Kickstarter campaign hopes to raise $5,000 by 4:24 p.m. EST Jan. 20. 
 
The man behind the film is Shaun Phillips, who says on Kickstarter the documentary "will be an entertaining and informative re-examination of the facts behind the making of the most popular musical group in history.   It will be the true story you've never heard, about the band you thought you knew everything about," using photos, video clips and interviews, some rare.:
 
The idea for the film came about because of another film he was working on about the Beatles and Michael Jackson. "In July 2009, a week after the death of Michael Jackson, I began working on 'Unbelievable!', a feature-length interactive documentary examining the influence The Beatles had on Jackson’s career.  My goal was to create a web index that would tell the history in chronological order.  The idea was viewers could watch the story as a documentary movie and at anytime click on it to open a hyperlink leading to the source material," he told us in an interview.  
 
"I did a lot of Googling.  Google doesn’t infringe on copyrights showing others work because they maintain they are an index, simply organizing information, providing small snippets and copies so that users can then follow links that will direct you to the true copyright holder.  I was hoping to create the same thing, but on a much smaller scale for this very specific subject.  I was hoping to make an entertaining Michael Jackson / Beatles index that can also be viewed like a movie."
 
His research on the Beatles early history led him to discover the story of Pete Best. "I learned a great deal more about Pete Best, the Best family and their involvement with the group.  I put a lot of what I learned into the index movie I was creating.  By the summer of 2010, I had trimmed it down from 8 hours to 2 ½ hours.  But after watching it became more and more obvious that the whole Pete Best chapter of Beatles history didn’t really shed much light on the influence of group on Michael Jackson.  So, I decided to cut out this whole section of 'Unbelievable!' and turn it into a separate short, 'The Beatles at their Best'."
 
Is the Best family cooperating with the film? "They were never asked for their cooperation, nor were the other members of the Beatles or their estates.  I did speak to Pete Best and his brother Roag in the summer of 2010 at a convention in New Jersey.  I told them both about 'Unbelievable!.'  At that point, I had been researching for a year and had already learned a great deal about Pete and the Best family’s involvement with the Beatles.  I hadn’t yet made the decision to do 'The Best of the Beatles,' but I had developed a new respect for Pete and the significant role he and his family played in the Beatles rise to become an entertainment phenomenon.  I was excited to meet him."
 
He first met both at a Beatles convention and had a conversation with Roag. "When discussing (the Beatles) Anthology, Roag mentioned that his father Neil Aspinall had told him that outside of doing the interviews, the only real request Ringo Starr had for the project was to fade Pete out of the famous 1960 Astrid Kirchherr fairground photo and to then have himself photoshopped in.  I was surprised to hear that. " 
 
Phillips says there are a lot of misconceptions about Best. "He wasn’t sociable, he was a bad drummer, he was unreliable, ect…  Most people either don’t know or can’t handle the truth about Pete Best.  The average Beatle fan only knows Ringo.  The ones that do know about Pete, the 'real' Beatles fans, don’t really know the truth either.  Most of them never saw the Beatles with Pete Best.  Their understanding of the group, like mine, was formed by reading or hearing comments from people connected to The Beatles in articles or documentaries like 'Beatles Anthology' and 'Imagine: The John Lennon Story.'  Films like these are made with the Beatles and their estates having the final say over the points of view to be expressed.  That means the same people who sacked Pete are the people who get to shape everyone else’s opinions of him."
 
He argues their rise to fame was due in part to Best.  "Most people don’t know that Lennon, McCartney and Harrison spent considerable time at the Best house for a year before they asked Pete to join the group.  They don’t know the Beatles were a bum band, unwanted by most everyone in Liverpool before Pete joined," he says. "They don’t know that when Best joined the Beatles, he was the only one who wanted the job. 
 
"They don’t know that Pete was a reliable band mate who also helped to manage the groups’ business affairs.  ... They don't know he was friends with Ringo Starr," he says. 
And, he says, "They don't know he was the most popular one in the group!"
 
And if the film happens, what do you hope to accomplish? "To see a beer summit with Pete Best, Paul McCartney & Ringo Starr.  Why not?  It would be a cool thing, right?" 
 
Also," he says, "to encourage fans of the Beatles, fans of music history and fans of the truth to take a fresh look at this story.  It’s a half century later and the true beginnings of the Beatles, the most incredible entertainment success story in the history of the world has never been properly told."
 
Phillips plans to use the money raised on Kickstarter to complete the film and promote it. To donate, go to www.kickstarter.com